Monday, October 17, 2011

Why would the Davis County Democratic Party endorse candidates in a Syracuse non-partisan race?


Why is the Mayor's house being used as a place for the Davis County Democratic Party members to meet and campaign for the 3 incumbents in the Syracuse city council race? 

City races are non-partisan in Utah. But the Davis County Democratic Party  (scroll down for the story) is encouraging all of its members to vote for the 3 incumbents: Clark, Peterson and Ocana. We looked on the Republican Party website and couldn't find any listings of candidates to support there. Isn't that unethical in a non-partisan race? Dunno, just strikes us as odd. What do you think?   

(Click on the picture to view it in a larger size. Or click here to go to website.)

And this is even more odd -the Davis Democratic Party website has a link to our Mayor's address and her husband is the Davis County Democratic party treasurer.  Even though the Mayor is a democrat, too, we thought she would keep the "party" out of Syracuse elections.

They are saying some pretty inflammatory things about the other candidates. Of Course most Syracuse residents don't go for that type of politicking. In Syracuse we like to do our homework. If you haven't had a chance to talk to all the candidates and ask them where they stand, here is their contact information:
(Click on the picture to view it in a larger size.)

Email us for a .pdf of the screen shots if you would like to share them - syracuseutahnews@gmail.com.

Local residents feel that the facts are not being presented, Syracuse leaders argue they are. What do you think?

Some residents have put together a flyer that they are distributing. Here is what it says:
Why Doesn’t Syracuse Have Sufficient Funds to Repair Roads?

1. Syracuse City is reporting $10 – 13 million shortfall over next 5 – 10 years to repair/maintain roads. City Council recently considered raising city taxes 28.75% ($450,000) to fund road repair shortfalls.
a) Public opposition motivated city council to “kill” tax increase proposal.
b) City Council decided to place a bond issue on Nov 2011 ballot to raise $3 million for road repairs. Estimated $8 - $10 will be added to citizens monthly utility bills to repay the bond and to fund ongoing road maintenance projects.

2. Public Works Director Mike Waite stated he has not been given road repair funding for several years. In a July 2011 city council meeting Mike stated “we have only $78,000 this year for road repairs.”  When asked about the $650,000 Class “C” Road funds shown on 2011 city budget, Mike stated “I don’t get those funds, I am given a budget allotment by the mayor and her staff.” 

3. UDOT has provided Syracuse City a total of $4,500,000 Class “C” Funds over the past eight (8) years. This further breaks down as follows:
a) $2,300,000 during past 4 years
b) $1,300,000 during last 2 years
c) $658,050 in FY year 2010
d) $650,000 for FY 2011

4. In a Sept 2011 telephone conversation, Jim Holfelt, UDOT Auditor for Class “B & C” Road Funds, etc.(telephone 801-965-4819) stated Class “C” Funds are only for repair & maintenance of roads. Such work is limited to labor, materials and equipment. He cited Utah Code 72-2-107 & 108.

5. Syracuse City FY 2010 budget reports to UDOT, Syracuse website postings for public information, and the City Self Audits do not coincide for Class “C” Road Funds reporting:
      a) $879,479 expenditures Reported to UDOT
         b) Syracuse Self Audit shows $598,897 expenditures
            c) $720,000 in FY 2010


6. On 28 Sep 2011 Stephen Marshall, Syracuse City Finance Officer, provided information requested by Val Cook about the number of employees currently paid using B&C road funds. He reported there were 14 different employees, 5 full time and 9 part-time & seasonal, who had payroll and/or benefits allocated from B&C Roads. The City Council recently reported there were four (4) employees in the roads department.  This is a contradiction to the 14 being reported on the finance records.

7. The Syracuse City Council meeting 9 Aug 2011 was videotaped.  Councilman Matt Kimmel made comments about: (1) we don’t have a road problem, we have a wage problem, and (2) we have been cooking the books.  These comments can be heard & viewed starting at the time mark 1 hour & 39 minutes on the 9 Aug City Council Meeting.

This 9 Aug 11 City Council meeting video can be viewed at:    
    http://www.syracuseut.com/
         “Syracuse City”
           “Your Government”
             “City Council”
               “Live Council Meetings”
                 “USTREAM”
                  “Archived Council Sessions”
                     “Syracuse City Council 08/09/11”

CONCLUSION: Budgetary documents seem to indicate that during recent years Class “C” Road funds provided to Syracuse City by UDOT were NOT used for road maintenance/repairs as required by Utah Code 72-2-107 & 108. It appears they are being diverted to pay expenses for other city departments. Citizens of Syracuse have not been given accurate information about where Class “C” funds are being used.  

Friday, October 14, 2011

The Bond Issue is a big concern for many Syracuse residents. How are we going to fix our roads?

Here is what the financial reports and budgets say (Click on the pictures to see them bigger.):

 


Our debt payments make up 18.3% of our non capital expenditures? Wow, that is a hefty portion of our budget. (A resident told us about this figure - but it is probably an even bigger percentage now because our budget is smaller than last year.)

One of the candidates was passing out a chart that combines the information on the debt payments reported to the State Auditor. Here it is:


Here is a link to the Financial Report the info came from.

$1.3+ million in payments per year until 2020 and if we bond again that number will be much higher.
The city reported in their FY2012 Budget that 67% (around 65 - 66% without the COLA) of our General fund budget goes to pay for wages and benefits, down from 76% 2 years ago.

With the debt payments and the wages and benefits, there seems little left to be spread around to all of the other needs the city has. What can we do to fix our roads? What do you think?

Thursday, August 25, 2011

In 2010 Mayor Alerts Syracuse Citizens About Maximum Bond Debt - Why is our local govt. trying to bring on more debt now?

Syracuse tackles $900,000 deficit in the park impact fee fund

(Article by Bryon Saxton, Standard-Examiner staff Sat, 07/24/2010 - 7:42pm)


"Compounding matters is the fact previous leaders have taken Syracuse to its maximum bond debt to build a new city hall and fire station, Mayor Jamie Nagle said. The city, in 2006 and 2008, issued a combined $15 million in bond debt for new buildings, said Amber Fowles, city finance manager. Those building bonds do not include the 10-year, $2 million bond issued in 2005 to develop the Jensen Nature Park."